Appraise and critique the article following the components of Synopsis
$10-30 USD
已完成
已发布大约 8 年前
$10-30 USD
货到付款
1. What was the purpose of the study?
Address the research questions, and/or study purposes; these will be used in a qualitative study, but unlike a descriptive non-experimental quantitative study or a quasi-experimental quantitative study, there usually will not be a hypothesis in a qualitative research study
2. Who participated or contributed data?
Address items such as target population, how sample was obtained, inclusion criteria, demographics or clinical profile, dropout rate; provide as much information as you can find in the article as to who were the sample participants and what was the final sample size
3. What methods were used to collect data?
Address items such as sequence of events, timing of data collection, types of data assessed, types of data measures that were collected
4. What were the main findings?
Report and address the main findings of the study
Conclusion: End your paper by comparing the study findings to your own clinical practice experience in relation to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines. In your own experience, do you find the results from New Zealand nurses to be similar to what happens in your own USA-based clinical practice setting?
Read the qualitative research study by Mckillop, Crisp, and Walsh (2012) “ Barriers and Enablers to Implementation of a New Zealand-Wide Guideline for Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Primary Health Care: A Template Analysis.” Then appraise and critique the article following the components of Synopsis (textbook pages 399-400). For this Learning Activity, you will only do Synopsis. This is a 2-3 page paper, 500 words. No title page, abstract or reference page are needed.
Citation: McKillop, A., Crisp, J., & Walsh, K. (2012). Barriers and Enablers to Implementation of a New Zealand-Wide Guideline for Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Primary Health Care: A Template Analysis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 9 (3), 159-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00233.x.
Hi I am Msc in medical biotechnology and biostatistics. I have experience of writing PhD level systematic reviews in health care and hospital management. I can provide a very critically appraised research and writing. I have read the questions and can do the required qualitative analysis perfectly. I am the perfect candidate because i have experience in critically, quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating clinical studies.
Looking forward to discussion,
Regards,
Suyash
I am a professional and a proficient writer who produces quality papers. I keep my word when it comes to deadliness. I offer 100% original work. I do extensive research on the papers I work on to ensure a perfect score. I am conversant with all writing styles to ensure that I meet all the assignment requirements. If you have additional requirements such as format or word count, please add them. Please consider working with me. Please review my bid and contact me for quality work. Please contact me for excellent work. Your reply will be highly appreciated.