User experience

2 Aims The aims of this evaluation. Will be different to the aims of the whole project, and may have evolved since the project definition. The overall aim may be broken down into a number of evaluation objectives (the ‘big questions’ for your study to answer – see Problem Statements in workshop), and explained 3 Study Method (include rationale for decisions made) 3.1 Experimental Design (e.g. one-shot, comparison, or repeated measures (for learnability)) 3.2 Participants 3.3 Tasks 3.4 Metrics 3.5 Materials Identify and give reasons for form. Include blank copy in Appendix. 3.6 Procedure 3.7 Expected Results 4. Evaluation Results 4.1 Written summary of overall findings 4.2 Performance Data (including Tables of Quantitative Data – mean times, ratings etc) 4.3 Usability Issues (including Table) 4.4 Redesign Recommendations Identify and outline roughly the changes that will resolve the issues identified May be included as a column in the Table used for 4.3 5. Evaluation Discussion (Including consideration of, for example, unrepresentative samples of users/tasks/contexts, confounding variables and biases, inaccurate or unreliable indicators). Further, and related evaluation studies. Appendices Materials (Invitation to Participate, Participant Information Sheet, Screener, Task Instruction Sheets, Observation sheets, Post-Test Questionnaire, any custom questions, protocols as required by any adaptation of CIF.). An Optimal path, Screening script, Moderator-Participant protocol and List of Possible Errors are not requested, as they just ‘sensitise’ your observation – they are typically not included in research reports.) Illustrations